关于MySQL LEFT JOIN 你需要了解的

即使你认为自己已对 MySQL 的 LEFT JOIN 理解深刻,这篇文章肯定能让你学会点东西!

ON 子句与 WHERE 子句的不同
一种更好地理解带有 WHERE … IS NULL 子句的复杂匹配条件的简单方法
Matching-Conditions 与 Where-conditions 的不同

关于 “A LEFT JOIN B ON 条件表达式” 的一点提醒
ON 条件(“A LEFT JOIN B ON 条件表达式”中的ON)用来决定如何从 B 表中检索数据行。
如果 B 表中没有任何一行数据匹配 ON 的条件,将会额外生成一行所有列为 NULL 的数据
在匹配阶段 WHERE 子句的条件都不会被使用。仅在匹配阶段完成以后,WHERE 子句条件才会被使用。它将从匹配阶段产生的数据中检索过滤。

让我们看一个 LFET JOIN 示例

mysql> CREATE TABLE `product` (
  `id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment,
  `amount` int(10) unsigned default NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY  (`id`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM AUTO_INCREMENT=5 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1
 
mysql> CREATE TABLE `product_details` (
  `id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL,
  `weight` int(10) unsigned default NULL,
  `exist` int(10) unsigned default NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY  (`id`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1
 
mysql> INSERT INTO product (id,amount)
       VALUES (1,100),(2,200),(3,300),(4,400);
Query OK, 4 rows affected (0.00 sec)
Records: 4  Duplicates: 0  Warnings: 0
 
mysql> INSERT INTO product_details (id,weight,exist)
       VALUES (2,22,0),(4,44,1),(5,55,0),(6,66,1);
Query OK, 4 rows affected (0.00 sec)
Records: 4  Duplicates: 0  Warnings: 0
 
mysql> SELECT * FROM product;
+----+--------+
| id | amount |
+----+--------+
|  1 |    100 |
|  2 |    200 |
|  3 |    300 |
|  4 |    400 |
+----+--------+
4 rows in set (0.00 sec)
 
mysql> SELECT * FROM product_details;
+----+--------+-------+
| id | weight | exist |
+----+--------+-------+
|  2 |     22 |     0 |
|  4 |     44 |     1 |
|  5 |     55 |     0 |
|  6 |     66 |     1 |
+----+--------+-------+
4 rows in set (0.00 sec)
 
mysql> SELECT * FROM product LEFT JOIN product_details
       ON (product.id = product_details.id);
+----+--------+------+--------+-------+
| id | amount | id   | weight | exist |
+----+--------+------+--------+-------+
|  1 |    100 | NULL |   NULL |  NULL |
|  2 |    200 |    2 |     22 |     0 |
|  3 |    300 | NULL |   NULL |  NULL |
|  4 |    400 |    4 |     44 |     1 |
+----+--------+------+--------+-------+
4 rows in set (0.00 sec)

ON 子句和 WHERE 子句有什么不同?
一个问题:下面两个查询的结果集有什么不同么?

用例子来理解最好不过了

mysql> SELECT * FROM product LEFT JOIN product_details
       ON (product.id = product_details.id)
       AND product_details.id=2;
+----+--------+------+--------+-------+
| id | amount | id   | weight | exist |
+----+--------+------+--------+-------+
|  1 |    100 | NULL |   NULL |  NULL |
|  2 |    200 |    2 |     22 |     0 |
|  3 |    300 | NULL |   NULL |  NULL |
|  4 |    400 | NULL |   NULL |  NULL |
+----+--------+------+--------+-------+
4 rows in set (0.00 sec)
 
mysql> SELECT * FROM product LEFT JOIN product_details
       ON (product.id = product_details.id)
       WHERE product_details.id=2;
+----+--------+----+--------+-------+
| id | amount | id | weight | exist |
+----+--------+----+--------+-------+
|  2 |    200 |  2 |     22 |     0 |
+----+--------+----+--------+-------+
1 row in set (0.01 sec)

第一条查询使用 ON 条件决定了从 LEFT JOIN的 product_details表中检索符合的所有数据行。

第二条查询做了简单的LEFT JOIN,然后使用 WHERE 子句从 LEFT JOIN的数据中过滤掉不符合条件的数据行。

再来看一些示例:

mysql> SELECT * FROM product LEFT JOIN product_details
       ON product.id = product_details.id
       AND product.amount=100;
+----+--------+------+--------+-------+
| id | amount | id   | weight | exist |
+----+--------+------+--------+-------+
|  1 |    100 | NULL |   NULL |  NULL |
|  2 |    200 | NULL |   NULL |  NULL |
|  3 |    300 | NULL |   NULL |  NULL |
|  4 |    400 | NULL |   NULL |  NULL |
+----+--------+------+--------+-------+
4 rows in set (0.00 sec)

所有来自product表的数据行都被检索到了,但没有在product_details表中匹配到记录(product.id = product_details.id AND product.amount=100 条件并没有匹配到任何数据)

mysql> SELECT * FROM product LEFT JOIN product_details
       ON (product.id = product_details.id)
       AND product.amount=200;
+----+--------+------+--------+-------+
| id | amount | id   | weight | exist |
+----+--------+------+--------+-------+
|  1 |    100 | NULL |   NULL |  NULL |
|  2 |    200 |    2 |     22 |     0 |
|  3 |    300 | NULL |   NULL |  NULL |
|  4 |    400 | NULL |   NULL |  NULL |
+----+--------+------+--------+-------+
4 rows in set (0.01 sec)



mysql> SELECT * FROM product LEFT JOIN product_details
       ON (product.id = product_details.id)
       AND product.amount=200;
+----+--------+------+--------+-------+
| id | amount | id   | weight | exist |
+----+--------+------+--------+-------+
|  1 |    100 | NULL |   NULL |  NULL |
|  2 |    200 |    2 |     22 |     0 |
|  3 |    300 | NULL |   NULL |  NULL |
|  4 |    400 | NULL |   NULL |  NULL |
+----+--------+------+--------+-------+
4 rows in set (0.01 sec)

看看下面的示例:

mysql> SELECT a.* FROM product a LEFT JOIN product_details b
       ON a.id=b.id AND b.weight!=44 AND b.exist=0
       WHERE b.id IS NULL;
+----+--------+
| id | amount |
+----+--------+
|  1 |    100 |
|  3 |    300 |
|  4 |    400 |
+----+--------+
3 rows in set (0.00 sec)

让我们检查一下 ON 匹配子句:
    (a.id=b.id) AND (b.weight!=44) AND (b.exist=0)

我们可以把 IS NULL 子句 看作是否定匹配条件。

这意味着我们将检索到以下行:
    !( exist(b.id that equals to a.id) AND b.weight !=44 AND b.exist=0 )
    !exist(b.id that equals to a.id) || !(b.weight !=44) || !(b.exist=0)
    !exist(b.id that equals to a.id) || b.weight =44 || b.exist=1

就像在C语言中的逻辑 AND 和 逻辑 OR表达式一样,其操作数是从左到右求值的。如果第一个参数做够判断操作结果,那么第二个参数便不会被计算求值(短路效果)

看看别的示例:

mysql> SELECT a.* FROM product a LEFT JOIN product_details b
	       ON a.id=b.id AND b.weight!=44 AND b.exist=1
	       WHERE b.id IS NULL;
	+----+--------+
	| id | amount |
	+----+--------+
	|  1 |    100 |
	|  2 |    200 |
	|  3 |    300 |
	|  4 |    400 |
	+----+--------+
	4 rows in set (0.00 sec)

Matching-Conditions 与 Where-conditions 之战

如果你吧基本的查询条件放在 ON 子句中,把剩下的否定条件放在 WHERE 子句中,那么你会获得相同的结果。

例如,你可以不这样写:
    SELECT a.* FROM product a LEFT JOIN product_details b
    ON a.id=b.id AND b.weight!=44 AND b.exist=0
    WHERE b.id IS NULL;

你可以这样写:
    SELECT a.* FROM product a LEFT JOIN product_details b
    ON a.id=b.id
    WHERE b.id is null OR b.weight=44 OR b.exist=1;

    mysql> SELECT a.* FROM product a LEFT JOIN product_details b
           ON a.id=b.id
           WHERE b.id is null OR b.weight=44 OR b.exist=1;
    +—-+——–+
    | id | amount |
    +—-+——–+
    |  1 |    100 |
    |  3 |    300 |
    |  4 |    400 |
    +—-+——–+
    3 rows in set (0.00 sec)

你可以不这样写:
    SELECT a.* FROM product a LEFT JOIN product_details b
    ON a.id=b.id AND b.weight!=44 AND b.exist!=0
    WHERE b.id IS NULL;

可以这样写:
    SELECT a.* FROM product a LEFT JOIN product_details b
    ON a.id=b.id
    WHERE b.id is null OR b.weight=44 OR b.exist=0;

    mysql> SELECT a.* FROM product a LEFT JOIN product_details b
           ON a.id=b.id
           WHERE b.id is null OR b.weight=44 OR b.exist=0;
    +—-+——–+
    | id | amount |
    +—-+——–+
    |  1 |    100 |
    |  2 |    200 |
    |  3 |    300 |
    |  4 |    400 |
    +—-+——–+
    4 rows in set (0.00 sec)

这些查询真的效果一样?

如果你只需要第一个表中的数据的话,这些查询会返回相同的结果集。有一种情况就是,如果你从 LEFT JOIN的表中检索数据时,查询的结果就不同了。

如前所属,WHERE 子句是在匹配阶段之后用来过滤的。

例如:

mysql> SELECT * FROM product a LEFT JOIN product_details b
	       ON a.id=b.id AND b.weight!=44 AND b.exist=1
	       WHERE b.id is null;
	+----+--------+------+--------+-------+
	| id | amount | id   | weight | exist |
	+----+--------+------+--------+-------+
	|  1 |    100 | NULL |   NULL |  NULL |
	|  2 |    200 | NULL |   NULL |  NULL |
	|  3 |    300 | NULL |   NULL |  NULL |
	|  4 |    400 | NULL |   NULL |  NULL |
	+----+--------+------+--------+-------+
	4 rows in set (0.00 sec)
	  
	mysql> SELECT * FROM product a LEFT JOIN product_details b
	       ON a.id=b.id
	       WHERE b.id IS NULL OR b.weight=44 OR b.exist=0;
	+----+--------+------+--------+-------+
	| id | amount | id   | weight | exist |
	+----+--------+------+--------+-------+
	|  1 |    100 | NULL |   NULL |  NULL |
	|  2 |    200 |    2 |     22 |     0 |
	|  3 |    300 | NULL |   NULL |  NULL |
	|  4 |    400 |    4 |     44 |     1 |
	+----+--------+------+--------+-------+
	4 rows in set (0.00 sec)

原文链接:http://www.mysqldiary.com/mysql-left-join/

there are many accredited colleges to
how to lose weight fast Damaged Hair Care for the Black Woman

Instead of a couture dress that others can only dream of affording
christina aguilera weight lossExclusive interview with Danielle Pettee
black porn
此条目发表在 网站开发 分类目录,贴了 标签。将固定链接加入收藏夹。

评论功能已关闭。